Period of Incarceration Does Not Entitle Accused to Bail If Engaged in Subsequent Serious Offenses: Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail

Share:
airport fundamental Election Supreme v Police 300A Hindu Supreme Court Accident proceedings Medical property bail 196 506 Date of Decision: May 16, 2024 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors. Evidence Punjab Courts Act 144 CPC Compliance Court Father Timely Evidence Police Dowry condonatioMurder n Bail Bail Insurance Crime Evidence © All Rights Reserved @ LAWYER E NEWS *Disclaimer: Always compare with the original copy of judgment from the official website. punishment Technical criminal Homebuyers SARFAESI Judgment Telangana Bail Order murderWorkman Evidence National Property LPG Employee Report suit Suicide Notice Rape Electoral Bond Breach Article 142 bail duty custody skills legal 2025 Summoning recovery Constitutional Bail property nclt army validity police governance evidence teachers bail property jurisdiction evidence Possession amendment life land evidence causes degree absence

In a significant verdict, the Supreme Court of India has overturned the decision of the Allahabad High Court to grant bail to two accused, Chandra Kumar and Rishi Kumar, involved in the murder of a police constable and other serious crimes, despite their extended period of pre-trial detention. The bench, comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Kumar, ruled on the matter on April 19, 2024, emphasizing the gravity of the accused’s actions post their initial arrest.

Legal Context and Background:

The appellants challenged the High Court’s order which had granted bail based on the duration of the accused’s incarceration and the bail status of co-accused. The Supreme Court scrutinized this rationale against the backdrop of subsequent criminal activities by the accused, including the murder of Police Constable Ajay Kumar during their judicial custody.

Case Facts and Judicial History:

Initially, Arvind Kumar, Chandra Kumar (alias Chandu), and Rishi Kumar, along with others, were convicted under various sections of the IPC, including 302/149 for a murder dating back to 2011. They were sentenced to life imprisonment. Their appeal for bail was granted by the High Court considering they had already spent over ten years in jail.

Court’s Assessment:

Misrepresentation in High Court: The Supreme Court noted that the High Court was not fully apprised of the additional serious crimes committed by Chandra Kumar and Rishi Kumar. This oversight was critical in their decision to grant bail.

Distinction of Roles: Justice Vikram Nath remarked, “The roles of the co-accused in subsequent serious offenses, specifically the murder of Constable Ajay Kumar, make a compelling case against the parity in bail conditions applied by the High Court.”

Danger to Society: The court highlighted that releasing the accused back into society poses significant risks given their propensity to engage in violent crimes.

Decision:The Supreme Court ordered the cancellation of bail for Chandra Kumar and Rishi Kumar citing their dangerous conduct post the initial incarceration. The appeal against Arvind Kumar was dismissed, and his bail was upheld due to the absence of direct involvement in the murder of the police constable.

Date of Decision: April 19, 2024

Jadunath Singh vs Arvind Kumar & Anr. Etc.

Download Judgment

Share: