Amendments Should Not Alter the Basic Structure or Cause of Action of the Original Suit: P&H HC
In a significant ruling, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a revision petition challenging the lower court’s decision to deny an amendment to the plaint in a property dispute case involving M/s PPC Exports Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Ganpati Controls & Switch Gears Pvt. Ltd. The case, under the bench of Hon’ble Mr. Justice Gurbir Singh, highlights the complexities of amending pleadings in ongoing litigation.
The court emphasized the legal principle that amendments to pleadings should not change the original suit’s nature or cause of action. Justice Gurbir Singh remarked, “The amendment can only be allowed if it is necessary for deciding the real controversy between the parties regarding the pending suit and not beyond that.” This statement underscores the court’s stance on maintaining the integrity of the original legal proceedings.
Case Background and Legal Implications
The dispute centered on an agreement to sell industrial premises, with subsequent developments including a settlement with UCO Bank and an unauthorized sale of the property. The petitioner sought to amend the plaint to reflect these developments. However, the court held that the amendments would introduce a new cause of action, thereby altering the suit’s basic structure.
In its judgment, the court referenced several precedents, including the landmark cases of Rajesh Kumar Aggarwal vs. K.K. Modi and Mahila Ramkali Devi vs. Nandram, to reinforce the principles governing pleading amendments. The court’s decision to dismiss the revision petition reflects a cautious approach towards maintaining the sanctity of initial pleadings in a lawsuit.
Date of Decision: December 14, 2023
M/s PPC Exports Pvt. Ltd. VS M/s Ganpati Controls & Switch Gears Pvt. Ltd. and others .
