Judiciary Must Act With Utmost Integrity and Responsibility”: Bombay HC Upholds Removal of Judicial Officer for Misconduct
In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has dismissed a writ petition challenging the removal of a judicial officer, Aniruddha Ganesh Pathak, citing severe misconduct including irregular attendance and intoxication during official duties.
Legal Context and Judicial Misconduct: The petitioner, formerly a Civil Judge Junior Division, faced allegations of misconduct detrimental to the reputation of the judiciary, leading to his removal under Rule 5(1)(viii) of the Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979. The case, grounded in principles of judicial service expectations, revolved around multiple instances where the petitioner was reported for not adhering to the judicial code of conduct expected at his level of responsibility.
Facts and Procedural Background:
The judicial officer was reported for irregular court attendance and apparent intoxication on duty, which was meticulously documented over several instances by different supervising authorities. Notably, incidents at Shahada and during a refresher course at Maharashtra Judicial Academy where he was found inebriated were central to the disciplinary action. Despite his defenses and pleas for reinstatement, the thorough inquiry process leading to his removal was deemed justifiable.
Detailed Court Assessment:
Procedural Fairness: The court highlighted the fairness in the inquiry process, where the petitioner was given ample opportunity to respond and defend himself against the charges.
Evidence of Misconduct: Through witness testimonies and multiple reports from senior judges and bar associations, it was established beyond reasonable doubt that the petitioner failed to maintain the integrity and decorum expected of his position.
Proportionality of Punishment: Addressing the petitioner’s challenge on the severity of the punishment, the court emphasized the high standards of conduct expected from judicial officers and deemed the removal proportionate to the seriousness of the established misconduct.
Decision: The High Court, affirming the disciplinary action, underscored the importance of maintaining stringent ethical standards in the judiciary. The dismissal of the petition reiterates the principle that judicial officers must exemplify the highest standards of personal and professional conduct.
Date of Decision: April 23, 2024.
Aniruddha Ganesh Pathak v. Registrar General, Bombay High Court, Bombay & Ors.
