No Room for Dual Property Values in Specific Performance Cases: Delhi High Court

88
0
Share:
property interest free Property Worker Bail Treatment Document Medical Work Bail spDispute a Suit v Illegal Duty office Dowry Husband Parole marriage statements Financial Children Pay Property vLife PostClaims Evidence Medical delhi Goods Hindu Marriage Act Life Evidence Service Agreement CashPetitioner POCSO Property violence VIGOURA Eviction evidence BSuicide ail stability Property Advocates Samsung tax EWS Workman Delhi Delhi High Court HALDIRAM Suit Health bailDate of Decision: April 03, 2024 M/S DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd vs. Manoj Kayal Chargesheet bankEvidence Tobacco Payments Jail Google family non-appearance-despite-repeated-warnings-persistent-evasion-from-cbi Tribunal's Divorce Education cbi Bail Written written Disciplinary Mobile Affidavit Payment limited rape Divorce violence publication natco parole accident 25 License Cross-Examine family Maintenance public Publication Bail father Bail  specific Habitual bail OBC-NCL deed disciplinary missing property nature ews sarfaesi jail post amendment evidence jurisdiction government Candidates license Training property Cheque maintenance property 304 evidence diploma police tax divorce divorce police negligence contract disability

In a significant legal ruling, the Delhi High Court has issued an order emphasizing the clarity and uniformity required in determining property values in specific performance cases. The judgment, delivered by Hon’ble Justice Vibhu Bakhru, pertains to a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 22.12.1970, involving a property measuring 5373 sq. Yds. In Civil Lines, Delhi.

The High Court’s verdict, which serves as a legal precedent, revolves around the central issue of fixing the market value of the said property as of 03.12.2012, as directed by the Supreme Court. The judgment categorically rejects the notion of having two separate property values, one at ₹130 crores and another at ₹75 crores, and underscores the need for a single, well-determined market value.

Justice Bakhru’s observations highlight the Court’s commitment to upholding the integrity of specific performance cases and ensuring that parties involved adhere to the decrees set forth by the Supreme Court. He states, “The approach of putting in place two separate sale considerations for the suit property…is wholly alien to the scope of determination of the market value of the suit property…Clearly, there cannot be two market values of the same property for specific performance of the agreement to sell.”

The judgment further underscores that while property values may have some subjectivity, it is entirely within the Court’s purview to determine a property’s value based on the evidence and material presented during proceedings. “It is well settled that the price agreeable by a willing buyer and a willing seller would, in normal circumstances, be accepted as the value of a property,” notes the Court.

Furthermore, the judgment takes issue with the notion that property prices have declined since 2012, as there was no concrete evidence to support this claim. The Court emphasizes the importance of considering all relevant factors when determining property values.

Delhi High Court’s ruling sets a clear precedent, emphasizing the need for a single, well-established property value in specific performance cases, thus ensuring fairness and transparency in such legal proceedings.

 Date of Decision: 05.12.2023

 NARENDER JAIN & ANR Versus ANIS AHMED RUSHDIE (DECEASED) THR LRS & ORS

Download Judgment

Share: