No Evidence of Intentional Injury Attributed to Cruelty, Medical Reports Point to Pre-existing Conditions: Calcutta High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 498A IPC
In a significant verdict, the Calcutta High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings against Sanat Kumar Sikdar under sections 341, 325, 498A, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), arising from allegations of marital cruelty. Justice Shampa Dutt (Paul) observed, “No evidence of physical injury attributed to cruelty or intentional harm by the petitioner was established, and medical reports indicated back pain due to pre-existing conditions.”
Legal Points in Judgement:
The court analyzed whether the allegations made under Section 498A, which addresses cruelty by a husband or his relatives, were substantiated by evidence. The revisional application argued that medical evidence, including MRI reports, pointed to pre-existing health issues unrelated to any alleged incident.
Facts and Issues:
The complainant alleged suffering severe waist pain after a night during which the room door was left ajar, raising suspicions of intentional injury. Medical examinations later diagnosed conditions unrelated to any external injury, such as canal stenosis and degenerative disc disease, suggesting that the pain was due to existing ailments rather than inflicted harm.
Court’s Assessment:
The court closely scrutinized various judgments related to the misuse of Section 498A IPC, emphasizing the need to protect legal processes from misuse in matrimonial disputes. It pointed out the importance of corroborative evidence in cases alleging cruelty and highlighted the necessity of specific allegations for the continuation of prosecution:
Medical Evidence: The court observed that the MRI findings did not support the complainant’s claims of intentional injury, ruling out the allegations as unfounded.
Legal Precedents: Citing precedents, the court discussed the criteria for quashing proceedings under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code (Cr.P.C.), underscoring instances where courts have expressed concern over the misuse of matrimonial laws.
Misuse of Section 498A: The judgment referenced several landmark decisions which caution against the indiscriminate use of Section 498A IPC as a tool for settling personal scores, emphasizing the judicial responsibility to prevent such misuse.
Decision: The High Court ultimately quashed the proceedings against Sikdar, noting that continuing the prosecution without substantial evidence would constitute an abuse of the legal process and cause unjust hardship.
Date of Decision: 04 April 2024
Sanat Kumar Sikdar vs. State of West Bengal & Anr.
