Supreme Court Grants Liberty to Petitioners to Represent for Revision of National Award for Teachers Selection Procedure

Share:
constable services identification unlawful agreement electricity cheques technical bail investigation teachers land appea evidence fees l High civil BAIL mineral kidnapping sale child child worker conviction Kashmir two acquisition factory Supreme Court

In a recent judgement, the Supreme Court has granted liberty to the petitioners in Writ Petition (C) No. 908/2019 to make a detailed representation to the Union of India for the revision of the selection procedure under the National Award for Teachers (NAT) Scheme. The court disposed of the writ petition, allowing the petitioners the opportunity to present their concerns regarding the selection process.

The petitioners had sought a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to revise the selection procedure and accommodate every candidate, while also advocating for the elimination of the jury system at the national level. The revised guidelines introduced in 2018 were challenged, with the petitioners alleging that the new system was opaque and discriminatory.

The court, after considering the arguments put forth by the petitioners and the Union of India, acknowledged the government’s prerogative in formulating the selection procedure based on expert opinion and relevant criteria. However, it granted the petitioners the liberty to submit a detailed representation to the respondent if they intend to revise the selection procedure in the future.

“In the event, the respondent intends to revise the selection procedure in the future, the petitioners have been granted the liberty to make a detailed representation, which may be considered for implementation,” stated the court.

The judgement emphasized that if the representation contains aspects that could potentially improve the selection procedure, the respondent should duly consider and implement them.

The decision brings hope to the petitioners and others concerned about the transparency and inclusivity of the NAT Scheme’s selection process. It opens the door for further discussion and potential revisions to ensure fairness and equality in recognizing and honoring the contribution of teachers across the country.

The Supreme Court’s judgement reflects its commitment to justice and the importance of continually reassessing policies to address concerns raised by citizens.

Date of Decision: July 14, 2023

GIRISHA CHANDRA MISHRA & ORS.   vs UNION OF INDIA             

Download Judgment

                  

Share: