WIFE MURDERED HUSBAND – MODIFIES CONVICTION FROM MUREDER TO CULPABLE HOMIVIDE – Delhi HC

Share:
national woman tax minor Evidence Copy maintenance police Landlord landlord claim Eviction ground Email Promotions judicial civil disclosure constable probate matrimonial relationship protection delhi cbse justice government automatic judiciary recovery government police view bail bail framing medical Rajya Sabha marriage matrimonial bank scale marriage bail wife decision national 67 copyright divorce plea under divorce fraud global documentsdocumentsvideo divorce sexual bail divorce validity sexual month friendlyfriendly suit disciplinary personal election case acquittal contract notice drug major day divorce teacher jewellers work honorable voluntary principle judgment Bail ordering wrestling remarks bail death criminal Cross- rape validity mother judicial wilful police daughters bail v eviction broad Examination wife land sexual marriage Delhi senior framing bail delhi guilty nationals bail

In a recent judgment delivered on June 26, 2023, the Delhi High Court addressed the case of an appellant suffering from psychosis and highlighted the state’s duty to care for mentally ill prisoners. The judgment modified the appellant’s convictioan and emphasized the need for proper medical treatment and support for individuals with mental illnesses.

Bench Stated, “Even though the mental illness of the appellant was not such that she can take the defense of insanity, it certainly falls under Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC.” The court recognized that the appellant, diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, was on treatment for psychosis since 1996, indicating a milder form of schizophrenia. The presence of psychosis during the alleged offense led to a loss of self-control even with slight provocation. Consequently, the court modified the appellant’s conviction from Section 302 IPC (murder) to Section 304(1) IPC (culpable homicide not amounting to murder).

The judgment shed light on the state’s responsibility for the care of mentally ill prisoners. Referring to a previous case, the court emphasized that the state must continue to look after mentally unstable individuals, even after their release from judicial custody. It highlighted the duty to provide adequate medical treatment, counseling, and rehabilitation services, particularly for those who do not require regular hospitalization and lack suitable living arrangements. The court called for the establishment of Short Stay Homes and Long Stay Homes to ensure a safe and conducive environment for individuals with mental illnesses.

The judgment also addressed the period of judicial custody undergone by the appellant. Considering the time spent at the Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences (IHBAS) as part of judicial custody, the court determined that the appellant had already undergone a significant period of imprisonment. Furthermore, it emphasized that the state must continue to bear the expenses of necessary treatment and the appellant’s stay in a suitable facility.

This judgment serves as a significant step towards recognizing the rights and needs of mentally ill prisoners within the criminal justice system. It highlights the importance of proper care, support, and rehabilitation for individuals with mental illnesses, ensuring their well-being and dignified treatment.

 Date of Judgment: June 26, 2023           

MADHU BALA  vs STATE 

Download Judgment

Share: