“Allahabad High Court Upholds Conviction in High-Profile Murder Case Involving Child Witness Testimony”
In a significant judgment, the Allahabad High Court has dismissed an appeal in a high-profile murder case, upholding the life sentence of Usman for the murder of his wife. The case, heard by a division bench comprising Justices Rajiv Gupta and Mohd. Azhar Husain Idrisi, was notable for its reliance on the testimony of a child witness, the son of the deceased.
The Court observed, “In the instant case, from the evidence adduced by P.W.2, who though is a child witness, has categorically stated in his statement recorded during the course of trial that his father was present in the house at the time of incident and committed the offence.” This statement was pivotal in determining the guilt of the appellant.
Usman was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for strangulating his wife, a case that attracted public attention due to the brutal nature of the crime and the involvement of a young child witness. The child, aged 6-7 years, provided a harrowing account of his father’s actions, stating that he killed his mother using a pillow and a rope.
The Court’s decision highlighted the importance of child witness testimony in criminal proceedings, particularly in cases where other forms of evidence may be limited. “The evidence of a child witness and its credibility could depend upon the facts and circumstances of each case,” the bench noted, emphasizing the reliability and lack of tutoring in the child’s testimony.
In their judgment, the bench also underscored the critical role of circumstantial evidence and the application of Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act. They stated, “The prosecution has discharged its onus by proving all the ailments necessary to establish the evidence and now the burden has shifted upon the accused to offer a reasonable explanation to show as to how the crime was committed, which is in his special knowledge, however, in the absence of the same, the accused would be guilty of the said offence.”
The case also featured comprehensive investigations by the police, including the recovery of the rope used for strangulation and detailed autopsy reports confirming asphyxia due to antemortem strangulation as the cause of death.
Represented by Shri Arvind Kumar Singh as Amicus Curiae and Shri J.P. Tripathi as AGA for the State, the case drew on several legal precedents to reinforce the principles governing circumstantial evidence and the evidentiary value of a child’s testimony in criminal trials.
This judgment serves as a landmark in the judicial system’s approach to child witnesses and the nuances of circumstantial evidence, setting a precedent for future cases.
Date of Decision: 14-03-2024
USMAN Vs. STATE OF U.P.
