“Motor Accident Claims: High Court Revises Compensation, Cites ‘Discretion of the Court’ in Personal Expense Deduction”

178
0
Share:
bail sex property bail arrest lambardar IPS provisions CyberspaceMurder Evidence Auction Discipline Cross-Examination Training evidence account kidnapping Tenant wasting 68 accident land cheque land withdrawal father transfer post fir Signature railways copyright probation cheque circumstances motor murder plaint notice bail proceedings admissible justice pay evidence ndps rice Teachers bail juvenile conviction property motor bail corporation suicide probation statement electricity bail Bail drugs time person JATINDER WALIA ASJ juvenilefalse bail passport authorities sale notice suit convict fir evidence murder surety suicide bailable daughters trial suit adult license answer hall business reservation

 August 17, 2023 – In a landmark decision, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted a total compensation of Rs. 8,44,508 to Daya alias Dayawanti, the widow of Sarwan Kumar who died in a motor vehicular accident. The Court observed, “it is the discretion of the court to decide the deduction for personal expenses,” and decided that a deduction of 1/3rd for personal expenses would be just and fair in this case.

Daya alias Dayawanti had filed an appeal for the modification of the award dated 28.02.2007, passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT). She sought an enhancement of the amount of compensation initially awarded by the Tribunal, which was Rs. 3,79,000. The accident had occurred on January 10, 2005, when a canter collided with Sarwan Kumar’s truck, leading to his immediate death.

The key issues addressed by the Court included the determination of the monthly salary of the deceased, enhancement of the income on account of future prospects, the deduction of personal expenses, and compensation on account of loss of estate.

Justice Sanjay Vashisth stated, “The income of the deceased should have been assessed according to the DC rates prevalent at the time of the accident, which were Rs. 5,812.75/- per month.” The Court also emphasized that in cases where there is only one dependent, the deduction for personal expenses is at the discretion of the court.

The Court partly modified the award of the Tribunal and granted a total compensation of Rs. 8,44,508 to the appellant, along with an interest rate of 7.5% per annum from the date of filing the claim petition. The appeal was allowed with the terms indicated in the judgement.

The judgement cited several key cases, including Smt. Sarla Verma and others v. Delhi Transport Corporation and another, Sangtari Muleem v. Karnail Singh, National Insurance Company Limited v. Pranay Sethi and Ors., and Smt. Anjali and others v. Lokendra Rathod and others.

This decision is seen as a significant step in ensuring fair compensation for victims or their families in motor accident cases.

D.D- August 17, 2023

Daya @ Dayawanti vs Arjun and others

Download Judgment

Share: