Manipulation of Investigation by Police Officer Cannot Be Overlooked: Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail Order of Police Officer
The Supreme Court of India, in a significant ruling, has set aside the Jharkhand High Court’s decision to grant anticipatory bail to Sandeep Kumar, a police officer accused of wrongful arrest and manipulation of an FIR. The bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Sanjay Kumar in their decision [2024 INSC 179] underscored the gravity of the allegations, emphasizing that “Manipulation of investigation by a police officer cannot be overlooked.”
Legal Point:
The key legal issue addressed was the improper grant of anticipatory bail by the High Court, especially in a sensitive case involving alleged misconduct by a police officer.
Facts and Issues:
Sandeep Kumar, the Officer-in-Charge and Investigating Officer in the Dhanwar PS Case No. 296 of 2021, was accused of altering an FIR to wrongfully arrest an individual and shield the actual accused. His anticipatory bail plea was initially rejected by the Additional Sessions Judge but later accepted by the High Court, a decision that the Supreme Court found to be unjustified.
Court Assessment:
The Apex Court meticulously discussed the role and conduct of police in investigations, reiterating that officers have a heightened responsibility in maintaining the sanctity of investigations. The judgement pointed out the need for careful consideration in bail decisions, particularly in cases involving police officers, due to their potential impact on public trust and the integrity of the criminal justice system.
Decision:
The Supreme Court overturned the High Court’s decision, emphasizing the importance of the nature of the allegations against a law enforcement officer. The Court observed, “grant of such relief to a police officer facing allegations of manipulating the investigation… would be against public interest.”
Date of Decision: March 6, 2024
State of Jharkhand vs. Sandeep Kumar
