Supreme Court Directs Cessation of Caste/Religion Mention in Legal Filings: Such a Practice is to be Shunned and Must Cease Forthwith

Share:
airport fundamental Election Supreme v Police 300A Hindu Supreme Court Accident proceedings Medical property bail 196 506 Date of Decision: May 16, 2024 United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/s Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors. Evidence Punjab Courts Act 144 CPC Compliance Court Father Timely Evidence Police Dowry condonatioMurder n Bail Bail Insurance Crime Evidence © All Rights Reserved @ LAWYER E NEWS *Disclaimer: Always compare with the original copy of judgment from the official website. punishment Technical criminal Homebuyers SARFAESI Judgment Telangana Bail Order murderWorkman Evidence National Property LPG Employee Report suit Suicide Notice Rape Electoral Bond Breach Article 142 bail duty custody skills legal 2025 Summoning recovery Constitutional Bail property nclt army validity police governance evidence teachers bail property jurisdiction evidence Possession amendment life land evidence causes degree absence

In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court of India has issued a significant directive to stop the practice of mentioning the caste or religion of litigants in legal filings. While allowing a transfer petition involving a matrimonial dispute, the bench comprising Justices Hima Kohli and Ahsanuddin Amanullah expressed surprise and concern over the mention of the caste of the parties in the case memo.

The apex court’s order was pronounced in the context of a Transfer Petition (Civil) No. 1957 of 2023, where petitioner Shama Sharma sought the transfer of a restitution of conjugal rights case filed by her husband, Kishan Kumar, from Sri Ganga Nagar, Rajasthan to Faridkot, Punjab.

In its order, the Supreme Court observed, “We see no reason for mentioning the caste/religion of any litigant either before this Court or the courts below. Such a practice is to be shunned and must be ceased forthwith.” This observation comes as a critical directive aimed at promoting equality and discouraging caste-based discrimination in judicial proceedings.

The Court also noted the non-responsiveness of the respondent-husband despite efforts to notify him and allowed for the possibility of his virtual participation in future proceedings. The judgment further directed the transfer of the matrimonial case from Rajasthan to Punjab, citing the convenience of the petitioner-wife.

The ruling is significant in its emphasis on removing caste and religion mentions in legal documents. This reflects the judiciary’s commitment to ensuring equality and non-discrimination in legal processes. The Supreme Court has also directed all High Courts to ensure compliance with this directive in their respective jurisdictions.

  Date: January 10, 2024

SHAMA SHARMA VS KISHAN KUMAR

Download Judgment

Share: