In Quest for Uniform Compensation: Supreme Court Remands Land Acquisition Cases for Fresh Consideration by High Court
In a significant judgement in March 2024, the Supreme Court of India, comprising Justices Surya Kant and K.V. Viswanathan, addressed a vital issue concerning the uniformity in compensation awarded for land acquisition under various projects in Karnataka. The judgement emphasized the importance of consistency and fairness in awarding compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
Legal Point: The apex court’s judgement critically revolved around the interpretation and application of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, focusing on the compensation determination process for lands acquired for irrigation projects in Karnataka.
Facts and Issues: The civil appeals emerged from enhanced compensation amounts awarded by the Karnataka High Court for lands acquired for several irrigation projects like Bennethora, Amarja, and Lower Mullamari. These compensations, as observed, lacked consistency and uniformity, leading to the remand of these cases for reconsideration.
Court Assessment: Justice Surya Kant observed, “In the impugned judgement(s), the High Court has made no effort to analyze the concerned case(s) either notification-wise or for that matter, village-wise, including other parameters required for arriving at just compensation amounts.” The Court stressed on the need for a detailed, independent analysis in each case, especially considering the vastness and diversity of the acquisitions.
The Supreme Court noted discrepancies in the compensation awarded by different courts for similar acquisitions. It underscored the necessity for a uniform approach, stating, “The High Court will make an endeavour to infuse uniformity in the matter of award of compensation, to the extent it is possible, in accordance with law.”
Decision: The Supreme Court disposed of the appeals, directing the High Court for a comprehensive reassessment of the compensation. The Court ordered, “The High Court, while undertaking this exercise, will not reduce the compensation to a rate which has already been paid to some of the land owners and which has attained finality.” Furthermore, the Court requested the High Court to expedite this process considering the acquisitions’ age.
Date of Decision: March 12, 2024
The Executive Engineer, KNNL vs. Subhashchandra & Ors.
