“Justice Prevails in Balancing Personal Liberty and Societal Interests,” Rules Punjab and Haryana High Court in Overturning Proclaimed Person Declaration
In a significant judgment, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Justice Harpreet Singh Brar, set aside an order declaring Birender Singh a proclaimed person in a cheque dishonour case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The ruling, made on December 12, 2023, emphasizes the need for fair and reasonable procedures in criminal proceedings, aligning with the principles of Article 21 of the Constitution.
Justice Brar, in his oral judgment, underscored the importance of a meticulous approach in legal proceedings, stating, “While the scheme of criminal justice system necessitates curtailment of personal liberty to some extent, it is of the utmost importance that the same is done in line with the procedure established by law to maintain a healthy balance between personal liberty of the individual-accused and interests of the society in promoting law and order.” This observation highlights the court’s focus on upholding the delicate balance between individual rights and societal justice.
The case (CRM-M No. 62379 of 2023) involved the petitioner, Birender Singh, challenging the order passed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Chandigarh, on September 30, 2023. The court had declared Singh a proclaimed person due to his non-appearance in the ongoing trial. Singh’s counsel argued that his failure to appear was due to medical reasons, and the absence of an application for exemption from appearance led to the issuance of non-bailable warrants.
In a critical appraisal of the trial court’s proceedings, Justice Brar noted procedural lapses, particularly the failure to comply with the mandatory conditions specified in Section 82 (2) of the Cr.P.C. The judgment referenced similar cases, including Major Singh @ Major Vs. State of Punjab and Sonu Vs. State of Haryana, to reinforce the mandatory nature of these procedural requirements.
Concluding the proceedings, the High Court allowed the petition, directing Singh to appear before the trial court within 15 days and fulfill the necessary bail and surety bond requirements. The court also imposed costs on Singh for wasting the court’s time, ordering a payment of Rs.10,000 to the Poor Patient Welfare Fund, PGIMER, Chandigarh.
This judgment is a reminder of the judicial system’s role in ensuring that procedural fairness is not overshadowed in the pursuit of justice, particularly in cases involving individual liberties.
Decided on: 12-12-2023
BIRENDER SINGH VERSUS UNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ANOTHER
