Right to Fair Trial Does Not Entitle Accused to ‘Unrelied Upon’ Documents at Investigation Stage: P&H High Court
The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed a petition filed by Kalyani Singh against the Central Bureau of Investigation, Chandigarh, challenging the refusal to supply documents deemed ‘unrelied upon’ by the prosecution. Justice Manjari Nehru Kaul held that the accused’s entitlement under Section 207 Cr.P.C. is limited to documents “relied upon” by the prosecution.
Legal Background
The petitioner sought quashing of an order dismissing her application under Section 207 Cr.P.C., which demanded access to specific documents listed in a seizure memo but categorized as ‘unrelied upon’ by the CBI in the charge sheet. She contended that her rights to a fair trial were being compromised by not having access to these documents.
Facts and Issues
The core issue revolved around whether documents listed as ‘unrelied upon’ in the CBI’s seizure memo should be made accessible to the petitioner. The petitioner argued that the entire seizure memo had been utilized by the CBI, therefore all documents within should be supplied. Conversely, the CBI maintained that only documents explicitly ‘relied upon’ in their charge sheet were relevant and had been shared accordingly.
Detailed Court Assessment
Scope of Section 207 Cr.P.C.: Justice Kaul emphasized the role of Section 207 in ensuring a fair trial by mandating the disclosure of all ‘relied upon’ materials to the accused. The judge referenced the Supreme Court’s directives, which allow the accused to request ‘unrelied upon’ documents during trial under Section 91 Cr.P.C., but not at the pre-trial stage.
Compliance with Supreme Court Orders: The court noted that the CBI had complied with the Supreme Court’s order by providing the petitioner all materials that were ‘relied upon’ and additionally supplied to the family of the deceased.
Distinction Between ‘Relied Upon’ and ‘Unrelied Upon’ Documents: The prosecution clarified that only specific entries from the seizure memo were ‘relied upon’ and that the documents sought by the petitioner did not fall into this category.
Statutory Restrictions Under Section 172(3) Cr.P.C.: Justice Kaul ruled out the supply of case diaries or police files as they are explicitly protected under the Cr.P.C. to prevent misuse and protect the integrity of ongoing investigations.
Ensuring Fairness Without Compromising Legal Protocols: The court concluded that while the petitioner’s desire to access all documents might stem from a place of seeking thoroughness, it does not align with the statutory framework designed to balance fairness with procedural integrity.
Decision: The High Court found no merit in the petition, emphasizing that the petitioner already had access to all documents necessary for a fair defense as mandated by law. The petition was dismissed, underscoring that the right to a fair trial does not automatically extend to the entitlement of all documents at the investigative stage.
Date of Decision: April 25, 2024
Kalyani Singh Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
