Kerala High Court Raises Doubts Over Identity and Motive: Acquits Accused in Murder Case
In a landmark judgment, a two-judge bench comprising Hon’ble Justices P.B. Suresh Kumar and C.S. Sudha has acquitted the accused in a murder case, citing serious doubts surrounding the identity of the deceased and the alleged motive behind the crime.
The judgment, delivered on [Date of Decision], revolves around a murder that took place on 13th June 2012. The prosecution had charged the accused with the gruesome murder of Vikram Naik, a native of Orissa, India. However, the court’s observations have raised significant questions regarding the prosecution’s case.
One of the most crucial aspects of the judgment pertains to the identity of the deceased. The prosecution had relied on the identification of the deceased’s body by relatives. Still, the court found that the evidence presented was insufficient to establish the victim’s identity beyond a reasonable doubt. The judgment noted, “The relatives identified the deceased based on photographs and belongings – Lack of convincing scientific evidence to establish identity – Doubts regarding the identity of the deceased persist.”
Furthermore, the court questioned the motive behind the crime. During the autopsy, it was discovered that the victim’s penis and scrotum had been cut off, leading to a gruesome and perplexing aspect of the case. The judgment highlighted the lack of investigation into the motive behind this brutal act. The court’s observation stated, “Failure to investigate the motive behind a brutal act – Lack of explanation for such a brutal act – Doubts regarding the genuineness of the prosecution’s case regarding motive.”
The judgment ultimately concluded that the circumstances established by the prosecution failed to prove the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. Consequently, the court decided in favor of the accused, stating, “Accused entitled to the benefit of doubt – Conviction and sentence set aside – Acquittal of the accused.”
This verdict has garnered significant attention due to the court’s meticulous scrutiny of the evidence and its emphasis on establishing guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. It serves as a reminder of the critical role that evidence and the burden of proof play in the criminal justice system.
Date of Decision: 07 September 2023
KOMISHAN BAG vs STATE OF KERALA
