High Court Quashes Arrest and Remand in PMLA Case – Non-Compliance with Section 19 – Orders Immediate Release

Share:
bail sex property bail arrest lambardar IPS provisions CyberspaceMurder Evidence Auction Discipline Cross-Examination Training evidence account kidnapping Tenant wasting 68 accident land cheque land withdrawal father transfer post fir Signature railways copyright probation cheque circumstances motor murder plaint notice bail proceedings admissible justice pay evidence ndps rice Teachers bail juvenile conviction property motor bail corporation suicide probation statement electricity bail Bail drugs time person JATINDER WALIA ASJ juvenilefalse bail passport authorities sale notice suit convict fir evidence murder surety suicide bailable daughters trial suit adult license answer hall business reservation

In a landmark ruling on October 31, 2023, the Punjab and Haryana High Court nullified the arrest and subsequent remand of Roop Bansal, stating a clear violation of procedural norms under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The decision emphasized the necessity of adhering to the statutory mandate of providing written grounds for arrest, as per Section 19 of the PMLA.

The judgment, delivered by a bench comprising Justice Arun Palli and Justice Vikram Aggarwal, underscored the deficiency in the Enforcement Directorate’s (ED) procedure, which led to the petitioner’s illegal detention. “The arrest of the petitioner was also illegal and cannot be sustained,” the bench declared, after finding that the ED failed to supply the written grounds of arrest to Bansal, an act that was deemed non-negotiable by the Court.

This case, which echoes the precedents set by the Supreme Court in similar matters, has brought into focus the critical nature of procedural compliance in arrests related to money laundering charges. The bench referred to the Supreme Court’s observation, “any non-compliance with the mandate of Section 19 of the Act of 2002, would enure to the benefit of the person arrested.”

The Court’s decision was also influenced by the argument presented by Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, the Senior Advocate representing the petitioner, who cited the recent Supreme Court judgment in Pankaj Bansal’s case, which necessitated the furnishing of arrest grounds in writing.

The petitioner, who has been in custody following allegations of money laundering linked to transactions prior to the establishment of a predicate offense under PMLA, was ordered to be released forthwith unless required in connection with any other case.

The High Court’s stand is a significant reinforcement of the legal protection accorded to individuals against arbitrary arrest and detention, safeguarding personal liberty as enshrined in the Constitution of India.

Date of Decision: 31.10.2023

Roop Bansal VS Union of India and another       

Download Judgment

Share: