High Court Grants Regular Bail Emphasizing Right to Speedy Trial in Murder Case Involving Illicit Relationship

Share:
disobedience land bail framing identity jail v property Land suits Mandatory Performance Criminal Live-in Relationships protection bail legal Land Live Acquisition landlord Crime appointment Gram Panchayat acquittal motor Father's Murder land civil actual account bail jurisdiction award land bail Deed constable licensing cbi sexual FIR bail cheque property property property Evidence e liberty

In a significant legal development, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana has granted regular bail to Manpreet Kaur, who was accused of murdering her husband, highlighting the fundamental right to a speedy trial as enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The case, bearing FIR No.38 dated 08.04.2021, involved charges under Sections 302/34/328/201 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The judgment, delivered by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR on 10.01.2024, addressed the petitioner’s prolonged custody and the need for expeditious legal proceedings. Mr. Yashpal Thakur, Advocate for the petitioner, argued that Manpreet Kaur, a mother of a minor child, had been incarcerated since April 8, 2021, severely affecting the welfare of her child.

The court underscored the importance of a speedy trial, stating, “The foundational concept of criminal jurisprudence is to ensure a speedy trial. The right to speedy trial is enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.” The court further explained that this right encompasses all aspects of the legal process, including investigation, trial, appeal, and revision.

The prosecution’s case relied on circumstantial evidence, but key witnesses, including Manjit Singh, PW-5, did not support the prosecution’s claims. Medical reports also contradicted the prosecution’s version, as no evidence of sleeping pill ingestion was found. Instead, only ethyl alcohol was discovered in the deceased’s body.

Despite the serious nature of the allegations, the court recognized that Manpreet Kaur had been in custody for an extended period, and the trial had not progressed significantly, with only 15 out of 35 prosecution witnesses examined so far. The court concluded that the determination of culpability should occur during the trial.

In its decision, the court granted Manpreet Kaur regular bail, emphasizing that this decision was based on the duration of her custody and should not be construed as an opinion on the merits of the case. The court urged the trial court to proceed without being influenced by any observations made during this bail hearing.

Date of Decision: 10.01.2024

Manpreet Kaur VS State of Punjab

Download Judgment

Share: