Gujarat High Court Denies Bail in Sensitive ISRO Espionage Case, Highlights Unauthorized Sharing of Information
High Court Court rejects bail for Kalpeshkumar Babubhai Turi, stressing the gravity of unauthorized communication of ISRO data to foreign entity.
The Gujarat High Court has denied the bail application of Kalpeshkumar Babubhai Turi, accused of sharing sensitive information related to the Space Applications Centre of ISRO with a contact in Pakistan. The decision, pronounced by Justice M. R. Mengdey, underscores the critical nature of unauthorized dissemination of information and the ongoing trial proceedings that necessitate the applicant’s continued custody.
Kalpeshkumar Babubhai Turi, an employee of ISRO’s Space Applications Centre, was arrested under allegations of transmitting sensitive information to a contact in Pakistan. The FIR (C.R. No. II-02 of 2023) filed at the Anti-Terrorism Police Station in Ahmedabad invoked Sections 66 F(1)(B) of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The prosecution claims that Turi shared unauthorized photographs of ISRO’s premises, raising concerns about national security.
The High Court scrutinized the communication from the Head, P & GA Department of Space, Space Applications Centre, which stated that the information shared was not classified as secret, confidential, or sensitive. However, the court emphasized that the unauthorized nature of the shared photographs from within a high-security area like ISRO remains a significant breach.
Turi’s defense, led by senior advocate Mr. Shalin Mehta, argued that the images were innocuous selfies and did not contain any confidential data. Additionally, Turi claimed ignorance about the contact’s location in Pakistan and highlighted his unblemished 17-year career at ISRO.
The prosecution, represented by APP Mr. J.K. Shah, contended that the transmission of any information from a sensitive installation like ISRO to a foreign entity is inherently dangerous. The fact that Turi did not have authorization to take and share these photographs exacerbates the severity of the offense.
Justice Mengdey noted that the previous bail application was withdrawn with the liberty to reapply if the trial did not conclude within six months. Since the trial had commenced and witnesses were being examined, no substantial change in circumstances justified granting bail at this stage. The court acknowledged that the material evidence, including the communication dated 27.02.2023, would be crucial during the trial but refrained from pre-empting the trial court’s assessment.
Justice Mengdey remarked, “While the files forwarded may not have been classified as secret, the unauthorized dissemination of information from a high-security government establishment cannot be taken lightly.”
The Gujarat High Court’s decision to deny bail to Kalpeshkumar Babubhai Turi reinforces the judiciary’s stance on safeguarding national security against unauthorized information leaks. The ruling highlights the importance of stringent measures against breaches in sensitive installations, ensuring that even non-classified information is protected from potential misuse. The case continues to unfold in the trial court, where further scrutiny of the evidence will determine the final outcome.
Date of Decision: June 10, 2024
Kalpeshkumar Babubhai Turi vs. State of Gujarat
