“Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions, Upholds High Court’s Decision to Grant Bail: ‘The Interest of Justice Must Be Preserved'”

Share:
bail evidence policy justice evidence fir interest bail property accused act services harassment eviction coke public clarification jurisdiction Dios medical certificate

In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India dismissed the Special Leave Petitions filed by both the victim and the State/Union Territory of Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The petitions challenged the Calcutta High Court’s decision to grant bail to multiple accused in a criminal case involving serious offences under the Indian Penal Code.

Justice VIKRAM NATH and Justice AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH presided over the case and delivered the judgment. The Court stated, “The interest of justice must be preserved,” thereby upholding the High Court’s decision but imposing additional conditions on the accused.

The Calcutta High Court had granted bail to the accused for offences under Sections 376(D), 228A, 506, and 120B of the IPC. The High Court’s decision was primarily based on the ground of parity as bail had been granted to the main accused, Jitendra Narain.

The Supreme Court agreed with the High Court’s ultimate decision to grant bail but for entirely different reasons. “We do not find reason to interfere with the Impugned Judgments,” the Court observed. However, it imposed additional conditions on the accused, including expeditious proceedings by the Trial Court and full cooperation from the accused during the trial.

 Victim’s Safety

The Court emphasized the importance of the victim’s safety, stating, “The onus of ensuring their safety is on the Union Territory Administration.” The Director-General of Police was directed to examine the victim’s subsequent complaints and take appropriate action within ten days.

The Court referred to previous judgments outlining the factors to be considered while granting or refusing bail. These include the nature of the accusation, severity of the punishment, and the likelihood of the accused absconding.

The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed, and any pending applications were disposed of. The Court’s decision serves as a significant precedent in cases involving the grant of bail for serious offences.

Date of Decision: August 24, 2023

XXX  vs UNION TERRITORY OF ANDAMAN  & NICOBAR ISLANDS & ANR. 

Download Judgment

Share: