Supreme Court Upholds Importance of Fair Investigation and the Scope of High Court’s Powers in Bail Applications
On May 11, 2023, New Delhi, In a significant judgment delivered today, the Supreme Court of India upheld the concerns raised by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh regarding lapses in the investigation of a sensitive criminal case. The Court, while dismissing the appeal against the Impugned Judgment, emphasized the crucial role of conducting a thorough and fair investigation to ensure justice is served and to prevent the possibility of a miscarriage of justice.
The case before the Supreme Court involved an appeal filed by Inspector Sanjay Dubey against the Judgment and Order rendered by a learned Single Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Jabalpur. The High Court, in its Impugned Judgment, had found the appellant guilty of dereliction of duty and observed that he was unfit to hold any responsible post in the Police Department.
During the course of the proceedings, the High Court had expressed its dissatisfaction with the investigation conducted by the police officers, including the appellant. It noted that there were lapses in bringing all relevant materials on record, which could potentially lead to a miscarriage of justice. The High Court, being a Constitutional Court with powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, sought to address these concerns in the interest of justice.
While delivering the judgment, the Supreme Court acknowledged that the High Court had exceeded its jurisdiction by issuing certain directions during the pendency of a bail application. However, the Court recognized that the concerns raised by the High Court were justified given the gravity of the case and the need to prevent any potential miscarriage of justice. The Court held that the High Court’s observations should not be treated as findings against the appellant in the departmental proceedings that would be initiated against him.
Furthermore, the Supreme Court clarified that the jurisdiction of the High Court in a bail application is limited to deciding whether to grant or reject bail. However, it stressed that the High Court has broader powers under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution to intervene in exceptional cases where the interest of justice necessitates it.
The Court also highlighted the significance of examining acquittals and recording reasons for failures in prosecution cases. It emphasized the need for a procedural mechanism to ensure that the cause of justice is served, and the rights of the innocent are safeguarded.
Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Impugned Judgment. It reiterated the importance of conducting a fair investigation and clarified the scope of the High Court’s powers in bail applications. The Court emphasized that the observations made by the High Court should not prejudice the appellant in the departmental proceedings, where he would have the opportunity to raise all grounds and contentions.
CASE TITLE: SANJAY DUBEY VS THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND ANOTHER
DATE OF DECISION: May 11, 2023
