Horticulture Development Officer’s Anticipatory Bail Plea Dismissed in Land Acquisition Scam, Punjab and Haryana High Court Emphasizes Seriousness of Economic Offences
In a significant development, the Punjab and Haryana High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, has dismissed the anticipatory bail application of Jaspreet Singh Sidhu, a Horticulture Development Officer, in connection with a corruption case related to land acquisition for the “Aerotropolis Residential Project” near Mohali.
The case, detailed under FIR No. 16 dated 02.05.2023, implicates Sidhu in allegedly assisting a senior IAS officer’s wife in obtaining wrongful compensation during the land acquisition process by GMADA (Greater Mohali Area Development Authority). The FIR encompasses serious charges under various sections of the IPC and the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act 2018.
Justice Chitkara, in his stringent observation, noted, “The allegations are serious and show the involvement of senior bureaucrats who were duty-bound to work honestly but instead facilitated unlawful gains.” This remark underscores the court’s stern stance on corruption and economic offences.
The court found substantial evidence against the petitioner, including discrepancies in assessment reports and Sidhu’s signatures on official documents, indicating his active involvement in the scam. “There is sufficient evidence against the petitioner to connect him with the crime, as such, he is not entitled to bail,” the judge remarked, highlighting the gravity of the offences.
Sidhu’s counsel argued for the bail, stating that any tampering with reports might have occurred without his client’s knowledge or involvement. However, the state counsel vehemently opposed the bail, illustrating the petitioner’s role in a larger conspiracy and the need for custodial interrogation.
Referencing several Supreme Court judgments, Justice Chitkara emphasized the need for rigorous scrutiny in cases involving corruption, stating, “Economic offences having deep-rooted conspiracies need to be viewed seriously as they pose a severe threat to the financial health of the country.”
The decision to deny anticipatory bail reflects the judiciary’s firm approach towards tackling corruption and maintaining public trust in the system. The case has been marked as a significant step in upholding justice and accountability in public administration.
Date of Decision: 23 January 2024
Jaspreet Singh Sidhu VS State of Punjab
