Delhi High Court Grants Permission for Property Repairs Post-MCD Demolition: A Move Towards Amicable Resolution and Regularisation

175
0
Share:
fir bail transport pay Fees Public T20 World Cup v Pay Video School company Human Rape Sexual Taxable Evidence Tax Statement property students Policy Bail Bail cheques Police Accident Service Claim Trademark Cognizance smuggling NI Eviction Agreement Minister Acid spa Old Delhi HC MBBS DivorceLand Child Evidence Bail Senior Marriage Maintenance Application Property Exam Evidence Divorce doctrine pocso award Medical public Income Tax constable National bailUniversity Property Recovery Evidence Adopted v Payment territorial corporation Bail liability police bank Constitutionality child nature claim domestic Limitation bsnl traffic property railway legal landlords Relationship Citizen property Tax custody phonetic predicate Acquisition forum public asset tax wire eligibility violence physical financial second trademark person Corpus Director TDS policy entertainment parody games recovery 14 tax judiciary claims court bar 34 Raps advertisement employees salary mother rape decisions students 138 divorce bail CBI fir evidence evidence eviction drc lower doctors legal investigation civil copyright

In a significant judgment that clarifies the rights of property owners to undertake repairs, the High Court of Delhi, led by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, has set a precedent in the case of Lakhbir Singh (since deceased) & Ors. Versus Kawaljeet Singh Bhatia & Anr. The court decisively ruled in favor of allowing property owners to conduct self-funded repairs on their properties, especially in cases where damage is incurred due to actions by municipal bodies.

The judgment, pronounced on 24th November 2023, addresses a dispute where the petitioner’s property was damaged due to demolition activities carried out by the Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) on an adjacent property. The petitioner approached the High Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India after their application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking permission to repair their property, was dismissed by the Trial Court.

In her landmark observation, Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora noted, “There is no legal impediment in the Petitioner carrying out the repairs proposed by them in this petition.” This statement underlines the court’s stance on the fundamental right of property owners to maintain and repair their premises, especially in scenarios where external factors have caused damage.

The case also highlighted the issue of unauthorized constructions, with the court confirming that no current proceedings were pending against the petitioner’s property for such violations. Moreover, the judgment laid out a clear path for both the petitioner and the respondent to apply for regularization of any unauthorized constructions under the existing policy.

The court’s decision, setting aside the previous order of the Trial Court, has been widely welcomed by legal experts and property owners alike. It not only reinforces the rights of individuals to maintain their properties but also delineates the responsibilities and processes involved in such circumstances.

In conclusion, this ruling by the High Court of Delhi serves as a guiding principle for similar cases, ensuring that property owners are not unduly hindered from undertaking necessary repairs and maintenance of their properties.

Date of Decision: 24th November 2023

LAKHBIR SINGH (SINCE DECEASED) & ORS. VS KAWALJEET SINGH BHATIA & ANR

Download Judgment

Share: