Delhi High Court Grants Bail to Accused after 7 Years in Custody: Court Emphasizes Liberty and Fair Trial”

108
0
Share:
national woman tax minor Evidence Copy maintenance police Landlord landlord claim Eviction ground Email Promotions judicial civil disclosure constable probate matrimonial relationship protection delhi cbse justice government automatic judiciary recovery government police view bail bail framing medical Rajya Sabha marriage matrimonial bank scale marriage bail wife decision national 67 copyright divorce plea under divorce fraud global documentsdocumentsvideo divorce sexual bail divorce validity sexual month friendlyfriendly suit disciplinary personal election case acquittal contract notice drug major day divorce teacher jewellers work honorable voluntary principle judgment Bail ordering wrestling remarks bail death criminal Cross- rape validity mother judicial wilful police daughters bail v eviction broad Examination wife land sexual marriage Delhi senior framing bail delhi guilty nationals bail

In a significant ruling, the High Court of Delhi, led by HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, has granted bail to an accused who had been in judicial custody for over 7 years. The decision, pronounced on 16th August 2023, sheds light on the importance of personal liberty and fair trial even in cases involving serious offenses. The case centered around charges under Sections 8/21/22/23/29 of the NDPS Act, with the accused seeking regular bail through a petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

The Court’s observations during the judgment were particularly noteworthy. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR observed, “Once again, we have to reiterate that ‘bail is the rule and jail is an exception’ coupled with the principle governing the presumption of innocence.” The Court took into account the duration of the petitioner’s custody and the nature of the contraband recovered, including Heroin and Cocaine.

The case had raised crucial questions about the balance between an individual’s personal liberty and the interests of justice. The Court’s decision rested on its evaluation of whether continued detention of the petitioner would serve any meaningful purpose. The judgment stated, “Considering the period of incarceration as the petitioner has already undergone more than 7 years 6 months and 13 days which is more than half of the minimum sentence of 10 years and since the trial would take a long time to conclude, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping him detained in prison.”

The Court’s decision aligns with established legal principles and guidelines, including those from the Supreme Court Legal Aid Committee vs. Union of India case. The ruling has garnered attention from legal experts and scholars, who see it as a reminder of the core values of the justice system. The Court’s emphasis on bail as the general rule and jail as an exception further underscores the significance of safeguarding individual rights.

The judgment is expected to have far-reaching implications, influencing future bail decisions in cases involving extended periods of custody and the need for a balanced approach between personal liberty and the interests of justice. The Court’s stance on adhering to these principles while granting bail has been praised for upholding the essence of the law and promoting fairness within the legal system.

Date of Decision:16th August 2023    

DAVID COLLIN ALIAS MADHUBUCHI OKORO vs  NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU       

Download Judgment

Share: