Supreme Court Overturns High Court Decision on Recruitment Qualifications: Relaxation Deemed Unsustainable Post-Application Deadline
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court of India has set aside a High Court judgment that allowed for the relaxation of prescribed essential qualifications for certain recruitment post-codes after the application deadline. The apex court, led by Justice Hrishikesh Roy and Justice Manoj Misra, delivered a significant ruling on November 9, 2023, impacting the recruitment process for Post Codes 447 and 556.
The Supreme Court firmly stated, “Relaxation deemed unsustainable post-application deadline without providing opportunity to similarly situated candidates,” addressing a crucial aspect of the public recruitment process. This decision underscores the commitment to upholding constitutional mandates and ensuring fair competition in recruitment.
The judgment centered on the interpretation and implications of the State Government’s relaxation/clarificatory order dated 21.08.2017, related to recruitment under the Himachal Pradesh Takniki Shiksha Board Act, 1986, and other relevant regulations. The court found that the relaxation was not legally sustainable as it was issued after the deadline for applications without offering a fair opportunity to all potential candidates.
The Supreme Court’s decision has reversed the High Court’s directions for recasting the merit list using relaxed criteria. The apex court emphasized the need for adherence to stipulated selection criteria, stating, “Merit list for Post Code 556 not to be redrawn; recruitment for Post Code 817 to follow extant rules.”
Furthermore, the Court decided not to disturb the appointments already made under the first advertisement for Post Code 447, acknowledging the practical implications of such a measure. The bench observed, “Appointments under Post Code 447 not to be disturbed despite eligibility gained through later relaxation.”
Legal experts view this judgment as a reinforcement of the principles of equality and non-arbitrariness in public employment. The ruling also signifies judicial restraint in administrative decision-making related to recruitment policies.
The judgment has significant implications for future recruitment processes, underlining the importance of transparency and adherence to predefined criteria. It sets a precedent for how alterations in recruitment qualifications should be handled, ensuring fairness and equal opportunity for all candidates.
This decision is expected to influence recruitment policies across various sectors, emphasizing the need for clear and consistent criteria in public employment.
Date of Decision: 09 November 2023
ANKITA THAKUR & ORS. VS THE H.P. STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS.
