Supreme Court Converts Conviction to Culpable Homicide – Granted Benefit of Doubt
In a significant ruling, the Supreme Court of India modified the conviction and sentence of the appellants in Criminal Appeal No. 1863 of 2010, granting them the benefit of doubt. The judgment, delivered by Justices B.R. Gavai and M.M. Sundresh, stated, “We find that the appellants are entitled to benefit of doubt in view of Exception I of Section 300 of the Jammu and Kashmir State Ranbir Penal Code.”
The case revolved around an incident where the appellants were accused of assaulting and causing the death of two individuals who were forcibly detained in their house. The victims ultimately succumbed to their injuries, leading to charges being framed against the appellants.
The prosecution relied heavily on the dying declaration of one of the deceased victims, along with the testimonies of witnesses. However, the Supreme Court noted contradictions in the dying declaration and the testimonies, as well as the failure of the prosecution to explain injuries sustained by one of the accused.
Considering the right of private defense claimed by the appellants, the court concluded that the possibility of the appellants acting in self-defense could not be ruled out. The judgment further stated, “We find that the appellants are entitled to benefit of doubt in view of Exception I of Section 300 of the RPC.”
As a result, the conviction and sentence of the appellants under Section 302 of the RPC were converted to the one under Part-I of Section 304. The appellants had already served a sentence of approximately ten years, leading the court to determine that the sentence already undergone was sufficient.
Supreme Court allowed their appeal, modifying the conviction and sentence. The bail bonds of the appellants were ordered to be discharged.
Supreme Court highlights the importance of considering all aspects of a case, including self-defense claims and the benefit of doubt, in reaching a just decision. The ruling sets a significant precedent in criminal cases involving allegations of assault and highlights the need for a thorough examination of evidence to ensure fairness and justice.
Date of Decision: January 12, 2023
MOHINDER PAL AND OTHERS vs STATE OF J & K
