Common Intention in Crime Inseparable, Bail Denied in Murder Case: Delhi High Court

76
0
Share:
property interest free Property Worker Bail Document Medical Work Bail spDispute a Suit v Illegal Duty office Dowry Husband Parole marriage statements Financial Children Pay Property vLife PostClaims Evidence Medical delhi Goods Hindu Marriage Act Life Evidence Service Agreement CashPetitioner POCSO Property violence VIGOURA Eviction evidence BSuicide ail stability Property Advocates Samsung tax EWS Workman Delhi Delhi High Court HALDIRAM Suit Health bailDate of Decision: April 03, 2024 M/S DSS Buildtech Pvt. Ltd vs. Manoj Kayal Chargesheet bankEvidence Tobacco Payments Jail Google family non-appearance-despite-repeated-warnings-persistent-evasion-from-cbi Tribunal's Divorce Education cbi Bail Written written Disciplinary Mobile Affidavit Payment limited rape Divorce violence publication natco parole accident 25 License Cross-Examine family Maintenance public Publication Bail father Bail  specific Habitual bail OBC-NCL deed disciplinary missing property nature ews sarfaesi jail post amendment evidence jurisdiction government Candidates license Training property Cheque maintenance property 304 evidence diploma police tax divorce divorce police negligence contract disability

The Delhi High Court, in a recent ruling on February 16, 2024, dismissed a bail application underlining the principle of common intention under Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) in a case involving a homicidal death. The case, presided over by Hon’ble Ms. Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma, highlights the significance of collective responsibility in crimes involving multiple accused.

The case (BAIL APPLN. 3733/2023) revolves around the FIR No. 709/2020, registered for an offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the IPC. The petitioner, Deepak, sought regular bail for his involvement in a fatal stabbing incident reported on July 11, 2020. The prosecution’s case, based on eyewitness accounts, including that of the deceased’s sister, Smt. Deepmala, depicted a grisly scene where the victim was allegedly stabbed by co-accused Saif Ali and others, including the petitioner.

Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma meticulously analyzed the material on record, notably focusing on the concept of ‘common intention’. The Court observed, “when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone.” The Court found the petitioner’s argument, claiming he did not cause the fatal Injury, to be without merit. It was noted that the petitioner was part of the group that collectively inflicted injuries leading to the victim’s death.

The Court also considered the testimonies of PW-1 (Deepmala) and PW-3 (the mother of the deceased), who supported the prosecution’s case and mentioned threats from the accused. The gravity of the offence and the impact on the victim’s family were pivotal in the Court’s decision to deny bail.

Given the severity of the crime and the principle of common intention, the Court denied regular bail to the petitioner, Deepak, stating, “the gravity of the offence is the basis of deciding as to whether the bail can be granted to an accused or not.” The Court emphasized the seriousness of the offence, which could potentially lead to life imprisonment or a death sentence upon conviction.

Date of Decision:  16.02.2024

DEEPAK VS STATE OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

Download Judgment

Share: