High Court Sets Aside Impugned Order, Condoning Delay in Filing Form 10: Mere Failure to Claim Accumulation Cannot Be Read as Intent Not to File

112
0
Share:
fir bail transport pay Public T20 World Cup v Pay Video School company Human Rape Sexual Taxable Evidence Tax Statement property students Policy Bail Bail cheques Police Accident Service Claim Trademark Cognizance smuggling NI Eviction Agreement Minister Acid spa Old Delhi HC MBBS DivorceLand Child Evidence Bail Senior Marriage Maintenance Application Property Exam Evidence Divorce doctrine pocso award Medical public Income Tax constable National bailUniversity Property Recovery Evidence Adopted v Payment territorial corporation Bail liability police bank Constitutionality child nature claim domestic Limitation bsnl traffic property railway legal landlords Relationship Citizen property Tax custody phonetic predicate Acquisition forum public asset tax wire eligibility violence physical financial second trademark person Corpus Director TDS policy entertainment parody games recovery 14 tax judiciary claims court bar 34 Raps advertisement employees salary mother rape decisions students 138 divorce bail CBI fir evidence evidence eviction drc lower doctors legal investigation civil copyright

In a significant ruling, the Delhi High Court has overturned the decision of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), granting relief to the Bar Council of India by condoning the delay in filing Form 10 for the Assessment Year 2016-17.

The bench, comprising Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Girish Kathpalia, delivered the judgment on January 5, 2024, after reserving their decision on December 13, 2023. The case revolved around the Bar Council of India’s plea for the quashing of an order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption) and for directions to accept Form No.10 with the condoned delay.

In their observations, the Court noted, “Mere failure to claim accumulation cannot be read as reasons to believe that the petitioner did not intend to file Form 10.” This statement was pivotal in the Court’s decision to set aside the impugned order, emphasizing the lack of sufficient grounds to assume a lack of intent to comply with the filing requirements.

The case highlighted the inadvertent oversight by the officials of the Bar Council of India, who failed to notice the amendments in the Income Tax Act and the corresponding rules. This led to a delay in filing Form 10, which the Court found to be a reasonable cause for the delay. The Court also drew parallels with similar condonations granted for the Assessment Years 2017-18 and 2018-19, reinforcing the principle of mitigating genuine hardships.

Date of Decision: January 05, 2024

BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA VS COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION)

Download Judgment

Share: