“Child Witnesses’ Testimony Found Truthful, Consistent, and Natural”: Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction in Murder and Kidnapping Case

166
0
Share:
tax rights FIR child fir Quashed 306 prima Lack of Promptitude and Violation of Constitutional Rights' Undermines Detention Under MPDA Act: Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order bar Bail Bombay High Court Upholds Right to Fair Trial: Directs Production of Withheld Documents in Sexual Assault Case money interest sexual Landlord Date of Decision: 02 November 2023 Chetak Technology Ltd. VS Union of India teacher acquittal murder bombay sexual sexual divorce land High Court sex maharashtra

In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court has upheld the conviction of Smt. Sangita Vilas Kiwade in a case involving the murder of a child, attempted murder of two others, kidnapping, and violation of the Bombay Money Lender’s Act.

The judgment, delivered by the bench of Justices GAURI GODSE and REVATI MOHITE DERE on 4th July 2023, emphasized the credibility of the child witnesses. The court observed that the “evidence of 3 child witnesses i.e. Rohit, Rahul, and Anmol is truthful, consistent, and natural.” [Para 20]

The incident occurred on 18th November 2010, where the appellant allegedly kidnapped four children and pushed three of them into a canal, resulting in the death of one child. The appellant was also accused of carrying out an illegal money-lending business.

The defense had argued that the child witnesses were tutored, but the court found no material contradictions in their testimony. The court further noted that the evidence on record “clearly reveals that the act of throwing three-year-old child Tejas into the canal was so imminently dangerous that the appellant had knowledge that, in all probabilities, it would cause his death.” [Para 23]

The court also referred to the Supreme Court’s observation in Pradeep Vs. The State of Maharashtra, emphasizing the importance of careful scrutiny of child witnesses’ evidence.

The judgment confirmed the convictions under Section 363 of IPC (kidnapping), Section 302 of IPC (murder), and Section 32-B(b) of the Bombay Money Lending Act, dismissing the appeal.

The ruling underscores the importance of child witnesses’ testimony in criminal cases and sets a precedent for the careful examination of such evidence.

Date of Decision: 4th JULY 2023

Yerwada Central Prison vs The State of Maharashtra 

Download Judgment

Share: