Justice Must March On, But Not Without Costs: High Court Grants Final Chance for Evidence in Land Ownership Dispute
In a notable judgement, the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, under the bench of Justice Vikas Suri, has granted a final opportunity to a petitioner to present evidence, conditioning this concession upon the payment of costs. The decision, delivered on 15th March 2024 in the case CR-804-2024 (O&M), underscores the importance of balancing the demands of procedural law with the essentials of justice and fair play.
Legal Point:
The case revolved around the petitioner’s right to lead evidence in a suit for a permanent injunction concerning land ownership. The key legal question was whether the petitioner should be granted a final opportunity to present evidence after multiple adjournments, in light of Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
Facts and Issues Arising:
The petitioner, Ramkanwar @ Ram Kumar, challenged the order of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bawal, which closed his evidence on the ground of repeated adjournments. Despite being given multiple opportunities, the petitioner failed to present his evidence in the case pertaining to land ownership.
Court’s Assessment and Decision:
Justice Vikas Suri, in his assessment, emphasized the significance of the right to lead evidence as a fundamental aspect of natural justice. The Court observed that while procedural law is aimed at facilitating substantial justice, it should not become an impediment. Referencing cases like Joginder Singh and others vs. Smt. Manjit Kaur, and State of Punjab and another vs. Shamlal Murari and another, the judgment highlighted the role of procedural law as a means to justice, not a barrier.
The Court acknowledged the petitioner’s failure to present evidence despite numerous opportunities but chose to grant one final opportunity. This decision was made in the interest of justice, ensuring that the petitioner’s case is not prejudiced due to procedural lapses. However, to ensure responsibility and to compensate the inconvenience caused to the respondents, the Court imposed a cost of Rs.15,000/- on the petitioner.
Decision: In conclusion, the High Court set aside the order of the lower court, allowing the revision petition subject to the payment of costs. The petitioner was granted one final chance to lead his evidence, reinforcing the principle that justice must be served, but not without holding litigants accountable for their procedural responsibilities.
Date of Decision: 15th March 2024
Ramkanwar @ Ram Kumar vs. Sub Divisional Officer and others
