“Bombay High Court Upholds Justice in Bank Corruption Case: ‘Depriving Appellant of Her Own Money Would be Travesty of Justice'”
In a landmark decision, the Bombay High Court, presided over by Justice M. S. Karnik, has set a significant precedent in a case involving the seizure of bank accounts in the wake of a corruption scandal. The court notably stated, “Depriving the appellant of her own money would be a travesty of justice,” emphasizing the principles of fairness and rightful ownership in its ruling.
The case, Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2024, revolved around Latha Mahalingam, the appellant, whose bank accounts were frozen during the investigation of her husband, an employee at Canara Bank, in a corruption case. The appellant’s plea sought to overturn the decision that denied her access to her funds, an amount totaling Rs. 2 lakhs, which had been frozen since 2004.
In a compassionate observation, Justice Karnik noted the appellant’s critical health condition, stating that she is suffering from fourth-stage cancer and should not be deprived of her funds for medical treatment. This observation underscored the court’s commitment to ensuring justice is not only served but is empathetic to individual circumstances.
The original verdict by the trial court was challenged on the grounds that it had become functus officio, meaning it had no further authority to modify its decision post-trial. The Bombay High Court, however, disagreed with this interpretation, allowing the appeal and setting aside the previous order.
Justice Karnik’s ruling emphasized that there was no conclusive evidence linking the seized funds to the crime for which the appellant’s husband was convicted. The court ordered the refund or transfer of the Rs. 2 lakhs along with accrued interest to the appellant’s account, subject to her furnishing a bond without security.
This judgment highlights the judiciary’s role in balancing legal procedures with humanitarian considerations, ensuring that justice is not just blind to circumstances but is also compassionate and fair. The decision is a significant step in upholding the rights of individuals caught in the crossfire of criminal investigations involving their family members.
Date of Decided : 26-03-2024
LATHA MAHALINGAM VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
