Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Jayram Deshpande in PMLA Case: “Role Not of Generating Proceeds of Crime, but Knowingly Assisted in Money Laundering”

Share:
evidence physical Bail Diamonds Tax civil v Jurisdiction Porsche College Car withdrawal Railway Financial Teacher Duty Service Property Notification Appointments Industries Film psychological Property damage Bail Room Husband Sarpanch Certificate Employment Children Judicial Central Rape judiciary Ownership driving Railway Workman driving Domestic fraud DV Date bank marital Daughter DRT Sex Educational Loan DVDuty Act child Candidate Section 202 vBail Sister absence Tenancy

Legal Point of the Judgment: In a significant ruling, the Bombay High Court, on 29th February 2024, granted bail to Jayram Vinayak Deshpande, a former Sub-Divisional Officer, who was implicated in a money laundering case arising out of environmental violations. The court based its decision on the finding that Deshpande’s role was not of generating proceeds of crime but rather assisting in the process of money laundering.

Facts and Issues: Deshpande was charged under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002, for facilitating illegal land conversion and construction within Coastal Regulation Zone-III. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) arrested him for his alleged involvement in aiding money laundering activities associated with unauthorized land development. The case originated from a complaint for violations of the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

Court’s Assessment:

The court noted that the Special Court had observed Deshpande did not generate proceeds of crime but assisted in laundering. It was significant that he was not a beneficiary of the proceeds.

Comparing his role with the co-accused Sadanand Kadam, who was granted bail by the Supreme Court, the High Court found Deshpande’s role in the crime to be lesser.

The court scrutinized the details of Deshpande’s involvement, emphasizing his role in granting illegal permissions and ignoring regulations for land conversion. Despite his misconduct, the court observed that his actions were more in the realm of assisting the prime accused in the money laundering process.

Decision: The court, considering the observations and circumstances, including the bail granted to co-accused Kadam and acknowledging that Deshpande’s role was not of generating but assisting in money laundering, granted bail to Deshpande. This bail was subjected to stringent conditions, including a bond and restrictions on leaving the country and interacting with witnesses or evidence.

Date of Decision: 29th February 2024

Jayram Vinayak Deshpande vs Directorate Of Enforcemen

Download Judgment

Share: