Supreme Court Upholds Terminal Benefits for Compulsorily Retired Bank Manager: “Forfeiture of Gratuity Not Envisaged in Case of Compulsory Retirement”

Share:
21 labour repeal long corporate evidence Conviction evidence University Death uapa Law stamp 138 Death Child workmen Penalty Plaint notice constable Weapon Property Complaint property pay forensic scribe bank copy suicide evidence goods framing 138 wife duty amendment medical Limits

In a landmark judgment dated November 6, 2023, the Supreme Court of India reaffirmed the rights of employees to terminal benefits post-compulsory retirement. The apex court, led by Justices J.K. Maheshwari and K.V. Viswanathan, ruled in favor of a Senior Manager from Punjab National Bank, Jyotirmay Ray, who had been denied his rightful provident fund contributions and gratuity after being compulsorily retired.

The case, which centered on the interpretation of various regulations and acts including the Punjab National Bank (Officers’) Service Regulations, 1979, and the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, concluded with the Supreme Court stating, “The act of forfeiture of gratuity is not envisaged in the present case as the provisions are silent on the aspect of forfeiture in case of compulsory retirement.”

Justice Maheshwari observed that the Bank’s unilateral decision to deny Ray’s benefits was not supported by the chargesheet or the enquiry report, as there was no recorded finding of loss caused to the Bank by Ray’s actions. He noted, “In the facts as discussed, the unilateral report cannot be relied upon by the Board of Directors to deny the benefit of payment of employer’s contribution of provident fund.”

The judgment has significant implications for employees facing compulsory retirement, ensuring that their rights to terminal benefits are protected. The Supreme Court’s decision underscores the principle that penalties should not extend to the deprivation of an employee’s earned benefits without clear justification and proper procedure.

The case was argued by Mr. Irshad Ahmad on behalf of the appellant, and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Gautam represented the respondent, Punjab National Bank. The court’s decision sets a precedent for similar cases, reinforcing the protective legal framework for employees’ post-retirement benefits.

Date of Decision: 06 November  2023

JYOTIRMAY RAY VS THE FIELD GENERAL MANAGER,PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS. 

Download Judgment

Share: