Accused’s Further Detention Unnecessary: Kerala HC Grants Bail in NDPS Case Involving Methamphetamine Possession
In a significant judgement, the Kerala High Court today granted bail to Muhammed Musthafa, accused of possessing 36.740 grams of Methamphetamine, initially alleged as MDMA. Justice C.S. Dias observed, “the petitioner’s further detention is unnecessary,” highlighting the completion of the investigation and the absence of criminal history.
Legal Point: The key legal point in this case revolves around the bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code, concerning an offence under Section 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The pivot of the judgment was the reclassification of the seized substance from MDMA to Methamphetamine, altering its legal and punitive implications.
Facts and Issues: Musthafa was arrested on February 2, 2024, for allegedly possessing MDMA for sale. However, the subsequent chemical analysis dated March 27, 2024, reclassified the substance as Methamphetamine. The main issues were whether the change in classification of the substance and the lack of criminal antecedents justified the grant of bail.
Court’s Assessment:
Substance Reclassification: The Court noted the change in the classification of the seized substance from MDMA to Methamphetamine, placing it in the category of an intermediate quantity under the NDPS Act.
Lack of Criminal History: Emphasizing the petitioner’s clean antecedents, Justice Dias remarked, “Indisputably, the petitioner does not have any criminal antecedents.”
Investigation Completion: Considering the completion of the investigation and the recovery of the substance, the Court found continued detention unnecessary.
Bail Conditions: The Court set specific bail conditions, including regular appearance before the Investigating Officer, non-interference with evidence or witnesses, a ban on committing offences while on bail, and surrendering of passport.
Sushila Aggarwal Reference: Citing the Supreme Court judgment in Sushila Aggarwal v. State (NCT of Delhi), the Court maintained the powers of the Investigating Officer to investigate and make recoveries, even while the petitioner is on bail.
Decision Granting bail, the Court directed Musthafa to be released upon executing a bond of Rs.1,00,000 with two solvent sureties and complying with the stipulated conditions.
Date of Decision: April 1, 2024
Muhammed Musthafa vs State of Kerala
