Bail In NDPS Case – Commercial Quantity: Prolonged Incarceration Exclude Section 37 of NDPS ACT: Delhi High Court
In a significant ruling by the Delhi High Court, an applicant under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) has been granted bail while underlining the importance of personal liberty in cases of prolonged incarceration. The judgment, delivered by Justice Tushar Rao Gedela on October 31, 2023, has garnered attention for its emphasis on the fundamental right to liberty enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
The Delhi High Court’s observation highlighted the need to balance the stringent conditions for bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act with the constitutional guarantee of personal freedom. Justice Gedela noted, “A plain and literal interpretation of the conditions under Section 37 would effectively exclude grant of bail altogether, resulting in punitive detention and unsanctioned preventive detention as well.” This statement underscores the Delhi High Court’s commitment to safeguarding individual rights.
The judgment also referenced several recent Supreme Court cases that have given precedence to an individual’s liberty, even in NDPS Act cases where recoveries have been made. In the case of Mohd Muslim @ Hussain vs. State (NCT of Delhi), the court stated, “The satisfaction which courts are expected to record, i.e., that the accused may not be guilty, is only prima facie, based on a reasonable reading.” This reflects the Delhi High Court’s recognition of the need for a balanced approach to bail applications, considering the delays in trials and the conditions of overcrowded jails.
The applicant in this case had already spent over four years and two months in custody, and the Delhi High Court took note of the slow progress of the trial. The judgment emphasized that pre-conviction incarceration should not be unduly prolonged and that the liberty of an individual must be protected.
The Delhi High Court ordered the release of the applicant on bail with specific conditions, including the surrender of the passport, cooperation in the trial, and regular communication with the Investigating Officer. Any breach of these conditions could lead to the revocation of bail.
This ruling by the Delhi High Court serves as a reminder of the judiciary’s commitment to upholding individual rights and ensuring that pre-trial detention does not become punitive in nature. It also highlights the importance of timely trials and the need for a balanced approach when considering bail in NDPS Act cases.
Date of Decision: OCTOBER 31, 2023
GAURAV MEHTA VS NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU
