Applicability of the Principle of Res Judicata: High Court Enhances Compensation in Accident Case
In a recent judgment, the High Court revisited the principle of res judicata in a personal injury case and enhanced the compensation awarded to the victim. The judgment, delivered by a bench consisting of Hon’ble Mr. Ashutosh Shastri and Hon’ble Mr. Divyesh A. Joshi, addressed various aspects of compensation, including attendant charges, special diet, transportation expenses, and loss of marriage prospects.
The case stemmed from a motor vehicle accident, and the victim suffered 100% functional disability. The Court examined the victim’s condition and considered expert medical testimony. It also factored in the victim’s age, occupation, and future prospects to calculate an enhanced compensation amount.
In its decision, the High Court referenced government wage norms for skilled laborers in determining attendant charges. The Court applied a multiplier to account for the victim’s life expectancy, ultimately increasing the attendant charges awarded by the Tribunal.
Similarly, the Court evaluated expenses for special diet and transportation related to medical treatment. It considered the victim’s need for regular hospital visits and applied a multiplier for future expenses, leading to an enhancement of the special diet and transportation charges awarded by the Tribunal.
Furthermore, the Court reassessed compensation for the loss of marriage prospects and increased the amount awarded to reflect the victim’s future prospects.
The total compensation amount was recalculated to include enhancements in various heads, with a specific clarification that no interest applied to the enhanced amount for attendant charges.
This judgment not only underscores the importance of revisiting compensation in light of changing circumstances and market conditions but also reaffirms the Court’s commitment to ensuring just and reasonable compensation for victims of personal injury.
In the context of the principle of res judicata, this judgment serves as a reminder that previous decisions should not bar the reevaluation of compensation when warranted by new evidence and circumstances. The High Court’s careful consideration of various factors in this case highlights the need for a flexible approach in personal injury compensation cases.
Date of Decision: 27 September 2023
CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD Versus RAM DHUNDIYA VANZARA
