“High Court Denies Anticipatory Bail in Alleged Rape and Disabilities Act Violation Case”
In a significant legal development, the High Court of Kerala, under the jurisdiction of Mr. Justice Gopinath P., has denied anticipatory bail to the accused in a case involving allegations of rape and violation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act. The judgment, delivered on October 10, 2023, has sparked discussions regarding the balance between individual rights and the severity of the alleged crimes.
The petitioner, identified as XXXXXXXXXX, faced charges under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including Sections 452, 354, 354A(1)(i), 354B, 376(2)(f), 276(2)(I), and 376(2)(n), along with a violation of Section 92(b) of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The allegations were centered around trespassing into the victim’s house and committing rape.
The court considered the petitioner’s argument that at the time of the alleged incident, he was only 18 years old and that the victim was his cousin sister who lived in an adjacent house. However, the victim, who suffers from substantial hearing disability, had clearly identified the petitioner as the perpetrator of the crime.
In his judgment, Mr. Justice Gopinath P. stated, “Though the petitioner is stated to have been only 18 years of age at the time when the offense was committed, that by itself cannot be a ground to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, especially considering the nature of the offense involved.”
The court’s decision not to grant anticipatory bail has raised questions about the delicate balance between personal liberty and the gravity of the charges. The judge emphasized the seriousness of the allegations and the victim’s identification of the accused as factors influencing the decision.
However, the judgment also outlined a path forward for the petitioner. It stated, “If the petitioner surrenders before the investigating officer within a period of ten days from today, the arrest of the petitioner shall be recorded and he shall be produced on the same day before the jurisdictional Magistrate.”
This judgment underscores the importance of thorough examination and careful consideration of the circumstances surrounding criminal cases, particularly those involving serious allegations. The decision has drawn attention to the legal framework concerning anticipatory bail and the rights of individuals accused of grave offenses.
Legal experts are closely following the case, and it remains to be seen how the proceedings will unfold when the petitioner surrenders and seeks bail before the jurisdictional court.
Date: October 10, 2023
xxx vs xxx
