Throwing Brick Pieces in Heat of Moment Not Equivalent to Intent for Murder: Allahabad High Court Alters Conviction from Section 302 to 325 IPC
The Allahabad High Court in the case of Durga Prasad vs State has altered the conviction from Section 302/34 IPC to Section 325/34 IPC, focusing on the legal principles of ‘intention’ and ‘knowledge’ under the IPC.
Facts and Issues: The appeal was filed against the life imprisonment sentence awarded by the trial court to Durga Prasad under Sections 302/34 IPC for causing death by head injuries with brick pieces during a dispute over clearing a drain. The primary issue was whether the act constituted murder under Section 302 or a lesser offence.
Court Assessment:
Eyewitness Testimonies and Medical Evidence: The court relied on eyewitness accounts and medical reports. The testimonies described the altercation and the act of throwing brick pieces, while the medical officer confirmed fatal injuries.
Intent and Knowledge Analysis: The court examined the intent and knowledge aspects, referencing Supreme Court precedents. The analysis concluded that the act was not premeditated and lacked specific intent to cause death.
Injury Assessment: The court noted that the inflicted injury, though serious, did not align with the requirements of Section 302. It was observed that the injury was more likely caused in the heat of the moment without a clear intention to cause death.
Defense’s Contention: The defense’s claim of accidental fall was considered but not substantiated by evidence.
Decision: The court allowed the appeal in part, modifying the conviction to Section 325/34 IPC. Durga Prasad was sentenced to three years imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 30,000, with Rs. 25,000 as compensation to the victim’s family.
Date of Decision: 06.02.2024
Durga Prasad vs State
