Allahabad High Court Grants Bail in POCSO Case: Emphasizes ‘Bio-Social Approach’ in Adolescent Consent Cases

103
0
Share:
advocate judicial party RPF Advocates live Mother SARFAESI steel v Departmental properly Evidence Divorce Property Factual Bail FIR 376 Bail bail Child Allahabad High Cour 1989 Appointment Investigation Cheque Fear mother IIIT court Law application Acquittal 29A Marriage Maintenance Dowry Application dowryMarriage bail Land Earning Justice Written Statement Maintenance Summoning Rape Video Death Bail Guilty jurisdiction 138Assault investigation Temple bail Wife velectricity Child Drinking final murder Love Cheque Throwing Brick Husband NDPS Case  allahabad addition preliminary evidence Cheque Bounce murder evidence grievances dowry 210 consideration order corporation advocate certificate marriage application mechanical maintenance financial evidence electricity wife probation bail individual investigation

In a landmark judgment, the Allahabad High Court, under the bench of Justice Siddharth, granted bail in a sensitive case involving the alleged abduction and sexual assault of a minor girl. The case, titled Salman v. State of U.P. and 3 Others, Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 47221 of 2023, was decided on November 6, 2023, and has garnered significant attention due to its nuanced approach towards the consent of minors in romantic relationships, especially under the stringent POCSO Act.

Justice Siddharth, in his judgment, emphasized the importance of a “bio-social approach” in understanding cases involving adolescents and young adults. This approach considers both biological and social factors that influence the behavior and decisions of teenagers, particularly in the context of romantic relationships.

The Court’s decision was influenced by the circumstances of the case where the victim, a minor, appeared to have consented to the relationship with the accused. The Court stated, “It is crucial to accept the science and psychology of an adolescent and young adulthood at this juncture,” acknowledging the complex interplay of factors that guide adolescent behavior.

The Court also referenced several precedents, including the landmark cases of S Varadarajan Vs. State of Madras and Atul Mishra vs. State of U.P. and 3 Others, to underline the need for judicial discretion in such cases. Furthermore, the Court laid down stringent conditions for the grant of bail, ensuring the presence of the accused during the trial and preventing any tampering with evidence or witnesses.

This judgment has been seen as a significant step in acknowledging the complexities involved in cases under the POCSO Act, particularly those involving adolescent consent. It highlights the judiciary’s evolving perspective on dealing with cases involving young individuals and the need for a more nuanced understanding of their psychological and social dynamics.

The Allahabad High Court’s decision is expected to set a precedent for future cases involving similar circumstances, where the context of adolescent relationships and consent must be carefully considered within the legal framework.

Decided on : 06-11-2023

SALMAN VS STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

Download Judgment

Share: