Delhi High Court Rules Professional Activities of Advocates Not Subject to Property Tax
In a significant judgment, the Delhi High Court has ruled that professional activities carried out by advocates from residential buildings are not subject to property tax under the category of business establishment or professional establishment. The decision, delivered by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Najmi Waziri and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sudhir Kumar Jain, came on March 23, 2023, in the case of LPA 564/2015 filed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation against B.N. Magon.
The dispute arose from an assessment order passed by the Municipal Corporation under Section 123D of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957, which sought to levy property tax on the professional activities of advocates. However, the learned Single Judge had earlier held that such services rendered by advocates fall within the realm of professional activities and cannot be classified or subjected to tax as a business or professional establishment.
The High Court, in its detailed judgment, examined the relevant provisions of the DMC Act, Master Plan Delhi (MPD) 2021, and the DMC (Property Tax) Bye-laws, 2004. The court observed that while the MPD permits professional activity in residential buildings, it does not empower the Municipal Corporation to levy tax on such activities. The court emphasized that taxation powers must be specifically mentioned in the statute, and professional activities were not included as a taxable category.
The bench referred to a judgment of the Bombay High Court in Sakharam Narayan Kherdekar v. City of Nagpur Corporation, which held that a lawyer’s profession is not a commercial venture. The Supreme Court’s decision in V. Sasidharan v. M/s. Peter and Karunakar and others was also cited, wherein it was established that a lawyer’s office is not a commercial establishment within the meaning of the law.
The High Court further emphasized the rule of strict interpretation in taxing statutes, stating that when the language of the statute is plain and unambiguous, there is no scope for interpretation. In this context, the court concluded that no tax can be levied on professional activities of advocates in the absence of a specific statutory provision empowering the Municipal Corporation to do so.
The judgment provides clarity on the taxability of professional activities carried out by advocates and affirms the distinction between professional and commercial activities. It sets a precedent that activities falling under the scope of the legal profession cannot be subjected to property tax under the guise of business or professional establishment.
The Delhi High Court’s decision brings relief to advocates who operate from residential premises and highlights the importance of precise legislative provisions for taxation purposes. The ruling serves as a reminder that strict interpretation should be applied to taxation statutes, with no room for intendment or resorting to extraneous material.
The South Delhi Municipal Corporation’s appeal was dismissed, upholding the earlier judgment of the learned Single Judge. The implications of this decision are likely to have far-reaching effects on property taxation for professional activities across the jurisdiction of the Municipal Corporation.
Date of Decision: March 23, 2023
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION vs B N MAGON
