Acquittal Set Aside: Orders Reconsideration of Acquittal in Fraud Case: Bombay High Court
In a recent judgement, the judicial bench led by Justice Prakash D. Naik issued a groundbreaking judgment on October 20, 2023, mandating the revaluation of a contentious acquittal in a complex criminal case. The decision, which pertains to various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), sets a precedent for revisiting cases of acquittal under specific circumstances.
The judgment stems from an appeal challenging the acquittal of the accused on charges including Sections 181, 420, 465, 468, 471, 406, and 34 of the IPC. The Appellate Court had initially affirmed the acquittal under these sections but also found merit in the application of Section 406 of the IPC against one of the respondents. The revision application sought the overturning of the acquittal and a fresh examination of the evidence.
Justice Naik, in his observation, emphasized the need for a comprehensive reevaluation of the case. He stated, “The evidence on record and the observations of both the Courts and observation of the Appellate Court would indicate that the documents collected by the Investigating Officer referred to herein above were admissible. The Appellate Court has also referred to incriminating evidence against respondent nos. 1 and 2.”
The judgment further highlighted the critical nature of intent and evidence in the case, with Justice Naik noting, “Evidence and Intent – Examination of evidence and intention of the accused – Observations by the Appellate Court regarding the admissibility of documents and incriminating evidence – Remand ordered to re-evaluate charges under Sections 406, 420, 465, 468, 471, read with Section 34 of IPC – No express findings on the merits of the case.”
In a procedural order, the impugned judgment and order were set aside, and directions were issued for the rehearing of appeals before the Sessions Court. Parties involved were instructed to appear before the Appellate Court, with a strict time frame of six months set for deciding the appeals. It was explicitly stated that the court had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.
This landmark decision has the potential to influence future cases involving reconsideration of acquittals under specific legal provisions. The legal fraternity awaits further developments in this case as it proceeds for fresh consideration before the Appellate Court.
Date of Decision: 20 October 2023
Dr. (Mrs.) Nirmala Jaywant Patil VS . Mr. Arjitsingh Dattajirao Ghatge,
