Lack of Central Government-Recognized Laboratory Analysis Leads to Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case: Kerala High Court

165
0
Share:
bail evidence custody matrimonial law fails advocates Abkari Act Evidence Document Divorce marriage 304a deed pregnancy Lawyer's tax Juvenile Bail sentence managing Water culpable engineering Robbery maintainability order childrenpermanent acquittal compounding cheque judgment 323 313 recovery divorce

In a recent decision, the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam has acquitted a defendant in a food adulteration case due to a critical deficiency in laboratory analysis. The judgment, delivered on October 30, 2023, underscores the necessity of conducting analyses in laboratories recognized by the Central Government, as mandated by Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The revision petition, which challenged the legality, propriety, and regularity of judgments in Crl.A. No.126/2003 by the Appellate Court and S.T.C.No.474/1997 by the Trial Court, revolved around allegations of selling adulterated banana chips. The Prosecution relied on an analysis report from a Public Analyst to establish the presence of prohibited substances in the product.

In a significant observation, the Court emphasized the importance of the analysis procedure, stating, “Due to the non-compliance with the mandatory requirement of analysis in a recognized laboratory, the prosecution fails.” This ruling reaffirms the Supreme Court’s position that analysis reports must be obtained from laboratories defined under Section 23(1-A)(ee) of the Act for a successful prosecution.

The Counsel for the revision petitioner argued in line with Supreme Court judgments, asserting that without such analysis, the prosecution would inevitably fail. The Court’s decision has far-reaching implications for food adulteration cases and emphasizes the need for strict adherence to legal procedures.

However, the Public Prosecutor contended that Public Analysts, appointed under Section 8 of the Act, make the Supreme Court’s judgment inapplicable to this case. This disagreement with the previous Supreme Court ruling formed a crucial aspect of the legal debate.

The judgment ultimately resulted in the acquittal of the revision petitioner, with the Court setting aside the impugned judgments below. This case serves as a significant legal precedent, highlighting the importance of proper laboratory analysis in food adulteration cases and clarifying the consequences of non-compliance with statutory requirements.

Date of Decision: 30 October 2023

K.ABDUL RASHEED VS STATE OF KERALA   

             

Download Judgment

Share: