Prima Facie Case Against Accused Paramount in Anticipatory Bail Decisions: Punjab and Haryana High Court
The High Court of Punjab and Haryana delivered a significant judgment today in the case of Sunita vs. State of Punjab (CRM-M-22248-2023), underscoring the importance of the prima facie case against an accused while considering applications for anticipatory bail.
Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi, presiding over the matter, rejected the anticipatory bail application of Sunita, who was implicated in an FIR alleging fraud and cheating in connection with a failed matrimonial alliance. The FIR, lodged at Police Station Garhshankar, District Hoshiarpur, accused Sunita and others of deceitfully obtaining large sums of money under the guise of arranging a marriage with promises of settling abroad.
In his decision, Justice Bedi emphasized, “The first and foremost thing the Court hearing the anticipatory bail application is to consider is the prima facie case against the accused.” This observation comes as a pivotal legal standpoint in the backdrop of anticipatory bail jurisprudence.
Sunita’s counsel argued that she was falsely implicated, stating that the financial transactions were strictly between the complainant’s family and the prospective groom. In contrast, the State and complainant’s counsel pointed to a confessional statement from Sunita’s co-accused husband, alongside recovery of gifts, arguing that these substantiated the charges against her.
The Court, while acknowledging these submissions, concluded that the prima facie evidence against Sunita was substantial. Justice Bedi further noted that the grant of regular bail to the co-accused husband did not automatically entitle Sunita to anticipatory bail. “Merely because Dilwar Ram has been granted the concession of regular is not a ground to grant the concession of anticipatory bail to the petitioner as the offence stands prima facie established,” he added.
Date of Decision: 29th November 2023
SUNITA VS STATE OF PUNJAB
