Accused Entitled to Bail if Gravamen of Allegation Not Established: Delhi High Court
In a significant judgement, the Delhi High Court today granted bail to Rajender Prasad Sharma, involved in a case concerning the import and trafficking of heroin concealed in mulethi logs. The order, passed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, highlights crucial aspects of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).
Brief on Legal Points: The Court, presided over by Hon’ble Mr. Justice Navin Chawla, meticulously examined the evidence, or lack thereof, linking the applicant directly to the heroin trafficking operation. Emphasizing the absence of conclusive evidence tying Sharma to the narcotics, the Court underscored the inadmissibility of co-accused statements as evidence, ultimately finding the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act unmet.
Facts and Issues Arising: The prosecution’s case centered around the seizure of heroin from a property linked to co-accused Razi Haider Zaidi, where mulethi logs supplied by Sharma were allegedly used to conceal the drugs. The prosecution heavily relied on circumstantial evidence, including call records and financial transactions. However, the Court noted that the mulethi logs, central to the case, were not tested for heroin.
Detailed Court Assessment:
Lack of Direct Evidence: The Court found no direct evidence proving Sharma’s knowledge or involvement in heroin importation.
Inadmissible Statements: The reliance on statements of co-accused under Section 67 of the NDPS Act was deemed inadmissible, referencing the Tofan Singh v. State of Tamil Nadu judgement.
Circumstantial Evidence Insufficiency: The Court held that mere supply of mulethi logs and the presence of Sharma at relevant locations didn’t conclusively indicate his involvement in the offence.
Consideration of Delay in Trial: Citing delays in trial proceedings, the Court observed that prolonged custody could infringe upon Sharma’s fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Decision: Consequently, Sharma was granted bail, subject to several conditions including a personal bond, restricted travel, and compulsory appearances in court. The judgement emphasized that these observations were solely for bail purposes and should not influence the trial’s merits.
Date of Decision: April 10, 2024.
Rajender Prasad Sharma v. NCB,”
